Critical Analysis #2 |
![]() ![]() |
Liar Paradox |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Not A Poet Member Elite
since 1999-11-03
Posts 3885Oklahoma, USA |
A triolet inspired by a question Shou-Lao (Oops sorry, I said Brad originally instead of Shou-Lao) presented in the Philosophy Forum. We haven't seen any of these in a while. Liar Paradox A paradox: This statement is not true. But if not true then false it has to be And yet, if false, then true it would be too, A paradox, this statement is not true, But false or true, it cannot be the two. With clarity, I think that all should see The paradox, this statement is not true, For if not true then false it cannot be. [This message has been edited by Not A Poet (01-29-2002 04:11 PM).] |
||
© Copyright 2002 Pete Rawlings - All Rights Reserved | |||
Phaedrus Member
since 2002-01-26
Posts 180 |
I thought for a minute I’d wandered into the wrong forum! This is cleverly put together Pete. ![]() |
||
hush Senior Member
since 2001-05-27
Posts 1653Ohio, USA |
This is cute. I love wordplay like this. "Maybe you don't like your job |
||
Christopher
Moderator
Member Rara Avis
since 1999-08-02
Posts 8296Purgatorial Incarceration |
you're making me dizzy pete... ![]() semi-colons? perhaps, i see a couple of places where it might help - truthfully, i think that while the idea is fascinating (both the paradox itself and the concept of the poem) it reads really hard... 'course maybe i'm just still dizzy. ![]() peace, C |
||
sunbunbun Junior Member
since 2002-02-07
Posts 21Durham, NC |
Fun, fun, fun! The word play is awesome. SBB |
||
Brad Member Ascendant
since 1999-08-20
Posts 5705Jejudo, South Korea |
Smooth as ice, Pete. |
||
Not A Poet Member Elite
since 1999-11-03
Posts 3885Oklahoma, USA |
Thanks guys. I was fun. Pete |
||
Roberta Little Junior Member
since 2001-12-18
Posts 42beloit wi usa |
I thought that was kinda cool. Good job. GOD's greatist gift is LOVE |
||
Always Lisa Member
since 2003-06-08
Posts 133 |
>Thanks guys. I was fun. >Pete Is that a paradox too? Grins* Always Lisa |
||
Not A Poet Member Elite
since 1999-11-03
Posts 3885Oklahoma, USA |
quote: You're Always (fun) Lisa. |
||
Sunshine
Administrator
Member Empyrean
since 1999-06-25
Posts 63354Listening to every heart |
Thoroughly enjoyed this... and in reading through the responses? Decided that Christopher is just being himself... Dizzy. LOL... Good job, Pete! |
||
netsky Member
since 2005-03-29
Posts 148Miami |
I enjoy but hung up on the logic of the opening line: "A paradox: This statement is not true" Is not truly a statement. It is not a statement because it makes no assertion except to say "this statement" is false. But no statement was made. Only the word "statement", which is neither true nor false nor anything but a blank. Ergo, the premise of the poem is a trick without basis in real logic. It tricks in readers who don't think along natural laws of reason. For example, another red herring: "True is false" means absolutely nothing, either. Other than my objection to the premise the poem is good and solidly put together. |
||
SEA![]() ![]()
Moderator
Member Seraphic
since 2000-01-18
Posts 22676with you |
no...it made me dizzy too ![]() neat though... |
||
Not A Poet Member Elite
since 1999-11-03
Posts 3885Oklahoma, USA |
For some reason I can't seem to find that Philosophy thread that inspired this. But the statement "This statement is not true" is a classic logic paradox. If it is not true then the statement is truthful. Think about it. That thread went into great detail discussing it. I wish I could find it. |
||
longte Member
since 2005-04-06
Posts 199Australia |
Really good FUN Any poem that makes you think or involves you in it is great This is a really good example |
||
netsky Member
since 2005-03-29
Posts 148Miami |
sure agree with all above who enjoyed this poem Not A Poet puts them together so well- all of his I've read are well-tailored. Yes.. as for the old philo. argument.. my qualifcations and readings? ZERO But I have some plain old sense. I don't know that I can argue agin' the ancient Chinese man, but, if his "statement" distills down correctly to the first line of your poem, then... I stand by my logic. I just can't -not- because no true statement was made, and you may, perhaps agree. But let's not tarnish the poem by -that-. The found-philosophy is fine for a poem and the poem is cooly crafted. But not all philosophical statements hold water or air for me... who has little formal education but does question authority A google search might bring up sources for the quote or "statement is false" thing. best regards, reid |
||
![]() ![]() |
⇧ top of page ⇧ |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
All times are ET (US). All dates are in Year-Month-Day format. |