navwin » Archives » Critical Analysis #2 » The Cat and the Dragonfly
Critical Analysis #2
Post A Reply Post New Topic The Cat and the Dragonfly Go to Previous / Newer Topic Back to Topic List Go to Next / Older Topic
Beau de L'air
Member
since 2006-08-03
Posts 105
Middlesex, England

0 posted 2006-09-01 04:44 AM



The Cat and the Dragonfly

She quartered the grass in mechanised lines,
a gunship, or like a hawk in the light,
hunting with a humming noise.

Cat.  Not a name to conjure with like Dragon
Fly. A pair of eyes in stroked sleek fur
is what a cat is.  

He killed the flying beast with casual ferocity,
and not a little killing skill.

She fought the cat for all her life remaining,
no more than a minute of dreadful thrill.

And he didn’t even eat her corpse in homage,
one predator to another.
          


© Copyright 2006 D Gettings - All Rights Reserved
Skippyrick
Member
since 2006-05-16
Posts 150
Rohnert Park
1 posted 2006-09-03 01:05 PM


Hi:

I like the idea of this poem.  One of a battle of wits where the losser is eather dead or just taking a nap.  You seem to have given the cat a bad rap though.

You may think about eather starting the first line with "Drangonfly:"  as you do in the secoend stanza with "cat".  Or taking out the cat and the he and she.  Showing us a little more of the battle a it takes place.

Cool thanks
Rick

Essorant
Member Elite
since 2002-08-10
Posts 4769
Regina, Saskatchewan; Canada
2 posted 2006-09-04 12:57 PM


I like what you would do with this.  But it doesn't flow that much like poetry.  I recommend adorning it with a more traditional attribute of poetry.  For example, rhyme, is one of the greatest traditional attributes of poetry, one that every and any man tends foremost to associate with poetry.  That is because it is a foremost token and tradition of poetry.  A bit of rhyme, and more poetic structure in the stanzas, may make it flow much more like poetry than prose.  


Beau de L'air
Member
since 2006-08-03
Posts 105
Middlesex, England
3 posted 2006-09-04 05:25 PM



Thank you for your comments.  Originally it had a lot more rhyme and humour!  But I got a lot of flak for it.  For instance at one time I referred to the cat as a "manky pair of gloves" but this wasn't understood very well by the US readership.  Oh well.   I think the late decision to divide the text into non rhyming couplets in the last six lines has something to do with its prosaic feel.  

kif kif
Member
since 2006-06-01
Posts 439
BCN
4 posted 2006-09-05 03:17 AM


chuckle..."manky pair of gloves"

Wow, you're back! I love this, esecially the rhythm, with pauses!

"A pair of eyes in stroked sleek fur" is a good *assonance, but to be honest, I first read it as "...stoked sleek fur" and thought that was great.

A good insight, Beau de L'air. Indeed.

(*'The Lotos-Eaters': Tennyson is in mind.)


Essorant
Member Elite
since 2002-08-10
Posts 4769
Regina, Saskatchewan; Canada
5 posted 2006-09-05 09:54 PM


"But I got a lot of flak for it."


You mean from the freeverse-fanciers?


Post A Reply Post New Topic ⇧ top of page ⇧ Go to Previous / Newer Topic Back to Topic List Go to Next / Older Topic
All times are ET (US). All dates are in Year-Month-Day format.
navwin » Archives » Critical Analysis #2 » The Cat and the Dragonfly

Passions in Poetry | pipTalk Home Page | Main Poetry Forums | 100 Best Poems

How to Join | Member's Area / Help | Private Library | Search | Contact Us | Login
Discussion | Tech Talk | Archives | Sanctuary