Critical Analysis #2 |
Breathing Closer to You |
young_blood Senior Member
since 2003-09-19
Posts 1115Indianapolis, IN |
this is a new style of poetry for me and i want someone who has seent this before to tell me what think, or if you've never seen this, tell me what you think anyway Breathing Closer to You She cries tonight n s i d e, Through the lines i n king the tears hidden in twilight n to Bowls beneath her nose. Stream deep into windows These three letters Spelling names of those who stand. Burn wax figurines Only miniature Icarus’ In the whittling away of the light, Makes ice cold dreams But don’t let the fire sounds fade. The last kiss (your first) is still remembered two days later, So those tears long for another. Too tired to turn and look At smiling figures that melt in your mind. They roll around And call you to do the same. You just missed your chance For another. (I missed it too.) |
||
© Copyright 2004 Alex Lewis - All Rights Reserved | |||
Always Lisa Member
since 2003-06-08
Posts 133 |
What's the style? What form are you attempting, Concrete, Calligram or something other than those two? I cannot give a fair assessment until your attempt is clear. Regards, Always Lisa |
||
young_blood Senior Member
since 2003-09-19
Posts 1115Indianapolis, IN |
i honestly don't know what style it is. i once read a poem by E.E. Cummings that was similar in style to this. (Obviously he is masterful at what he does, so i have no idea if this is even a form or not.) |
||
hush Senior Member
since 2001-05-27
Posts 1653Ohio, USA |
iT SEEMS LIKE THE LAST STANZA HERE IS BEEING A LITTLE TOO OBVIOUS IN TRYING To COMPENSATE FOR THE REST OF THE POEM, WHICH IS KIND OF CRYPTIC. I'm sorry, the caps were an accident, but I'm not retyping it. First of all, I'd drop the waterfall word art you're trying... it's really distracting. And I'm not quite sure E.E. Cummings style works well for most people besides Cummings... I find him really challenging as himself. Anyway, I think your imagery is kind of interesting, but without the last stanza (which serves as outright explanation) I had no idea what this was about, which is probably a problem. Maybe if you made it a bit more clear in the first part? |
||
young_blood Senior Member
since 2003-09-19
Posts 1115Indianapolis, IN |
very true hush. the last stanza did explain everything. i may just redo it and get rid of the cascading affect and keep it ambigious, but directionaly ambigious. thanks |
||
Always Lisa Member
since 2003-06-08
Posts 133 |
Let's pretend I know something...Then this is merely word play on your part. And yes, visual principles. Cummings was skillfulled with both sound and shape. The visual you offered was simplistic and the sound was pretty much mute to this ear. Both sound and image must carry the weight of expression equally well. Your summary towards the end was more like an instruction manual of what the reader should have got throughout your work. Still, I must credit your effort but I must also urge you to read descriptions of these forms... Concrete, Calligram but don't rely on just one... Google is full of info and poetry of these forms. It might do me some good as well to do the same. I myself haven't done enough homework with the same. Regards, Always Lisa |
||
⇧ top of page ⇧ | ||
All times are ET (US). All dates are in Year-Month-Day format. |