Critical Analysis #2 |
Torch This Winter's Lie ( revised from open) |
Cpat Hair
since 2001-06-05
Posts 11793 |
I, in stare Knew depths of sky to feel Flat as rolled stock blue Allowed to simply fool eyes Into thinking there was more beyond The cold touch of winter’s bowl Than mere truth of physics In past despair, I have lit a torch Holding it to edges of clouds Wishing flames to catch And warm in me something Other than the burn Of empty. Today, I search For the wrinkled folds Where night and day break crumbled sky To begin again the fumbled find Of match For I would burn this The hateful winter’s sky And know there was more To this the vacant heart Than just a passing sigh |
||
© Copyright 2004 Cpat Hair - All Rights Reserved | |||
Grover Senior Member
since 2004-01-27
Posts 1967London, ON, Canada |
Wow, I really liked this! |
||
Greeneyes
since 2000-09-09
Posts 9903In Your Poetic Mind |
sigh...I think it's amazing! ~~**~~ |
||
cynicsRus Senior Member
since 2003-06-06
Posts 591So Cal So Cool! |
Notwithstanding some rather promising lines scattered throughout the piece, there are also some glaring distractions. At first I thought the awkwardness of S1 L1 was merely a means of forcing a rhyme with S2L1, but then I came to see, this is the only rhyme throughout the entire piece. This awkwardness however, is repeated in S2L7 as well as S3L5. I’ve said it before but it bears repeating, that substituting adjectives for nouns, verbs for nouns, or any variation, in whatever converse form, comes across simply as amateurish. While I realize, forgoing punctuation seems to be the latest thing, it becomes quite tedious at times for a reader to go back and reread lines before having finished the entire piece, all because it was left to him to determine, in his own mind how the author meant to express a certain pause, emphasis or change in thought. How much time does it actually take to offer the reader that extra touch? Sid @ www.cynicsRus.com www.primetimerhyme.com |
||
Not A Poet Member Elite
since 1999-11-03
Posts 3885Oklahoma, USA |
It may seem like I am just following Sid around and maybe I am. Again I have to agree with what he said. The use of improper parts of speech is really distracting. IMO, it can turn a work from otherwise good to bad. As for the punctuation, you trip the reader up by starting right off with a comma. And you have a couple of others too. This leads one to expect punctuation and read accordingly. Since there is much missing, it becomes confusing. Personally, I am not in favor of the trend to avoid punctuation as it is an important part of written language and just seems lazy to omit it in most cases. In any case though, I think you should really skip it altogether if at all. This, of course, is just my opinion, biased as it is. Pete |
||
Cpat Hair
since 2001-06-05
Posts 11793 |
thanks for the look and the comments... back to the editing now... your thoughts are appreciated. |
||
Craw Member
since 2003-09-11
Posts 73Scotland |
The last two stanzas look as if they've been tacked on by your apprentice. The first two have real breathless rhythm and interesting use of language and they also seem to be saying something, but the last two? You're left thinking, 'eh'? |
||
⇧ top of page ⇧ | ||
All times are ET (US). All dates are in Year-Month-Day format. |