quote:

---

It sounds like a hoax, but it's apparently true: The Loch Ness Monster is on the science class syllabus for kids at Eternity Christian Academy in Westlake, Louisiana.
As reported by the Herald Scotland (which must track all Loch Ness-related news), a school that will receive tax-payer dollars, will teach kids that the mythological sea creature is real in order to debunk the theory of evolution. So pay attention: That will be on the test.
Eternity Christian Academy uses the  fundamentalist A.C.E. Curriculum to teach students "to see life from God's point of view."
According to the Herald, one textbook, Biology 1099, reads, "Are dinosaurs alive today? Scientists are becoming more convinced of their existence. Have you heard of the 'Loch Ness Monster' in Scotland? 'Nessie' for short has been recorded on sonar from a small submarine, described by eyewitnesses, and photographed by others. Nessie appears to be a plesiosaur."
Starting in the fall, thousands of schoolchildren will receive publicly funded vouchers to attend private schools, some of which are religious. Religious schools in Louisiana will receive public funding as part of a push from Louisiana's governor, Bobby Jindal, to move millions of tax dollars to cover tuition for private schools, including small bible-based church schools. Money will fund schools that have "bible-based math books" and biology texts that refute evolution.
http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/sideshow/loch-ness-monster-used-debunk-evolution-state-funded-190816504.html

---

quote:

---

5. Slave masters were nice guys: "A few slave holders were undeniably cruel. Examples of slaves beaten to death were not common, neither were they unknown. The majority of slave holders treated their slaves well."—United States History for Christian Schools, 2nd ed., Bob Jones University Press, 1991

---

quote:

---

The problem of public school textbooks is open to discussion because it is public, and the influence the Texas Board of Education poses to the rest of the country on that front is a similar subject.

---

quote:

---

Take the politics out and put the teachers back in – that was the message Rita Haecker, president of the Texas State Teachers Association, delivered to the Mexican American Legislative caucus in Austin on Wednesday. The caucus, 44 members of the Texas House of Representatives, held a day-long session to hear concerns about the new social studies standards written by the state board of education (SBOE).
The standards, preliminarily approved by the SBOE on March 12, sparked a controversy that has reached far beyond Texas borders. Led by a powerful bloc of conservative members, the board made a series of changes to the curriculum that critics deride as a right-wing ideological assault on the state’s public schools.
Specifically, they argue that the standards skimp on historical contributions by minorities, trumpet an overtly Christian perspective, and aggressively promote conservative political figures and “American exceptionalism.”
Because Texas is the largest purchasers of textbooks nationally, the changes, if approved, could be felt across the country.
With the standards due for final approval on May 21, the Mexican American Legislative caucus invited interested parties, including academics, educators, and publishing groups to testify about the changes. Although the committee cannot take any specific action to derail the revisions, members hoped that the profound concerns raised during the meeting will help build public opposition.
Throughout the process, TSTA President Haecker and others repeatedly spoke out against the SBOE’s enormous power in rewriting the standards and, by extension, social studies textbooks.
“The ultra-conservative members of the board have a narrow ideological view that not only ignores history but also ignores the changing world,” Haecker told the committee on Wednesday.
For example, Haecker said, these members “are constantly painting Hispanics in negative terms as foreigners and illegal immigrants, and they are discounting the roles of African Americans as well.”
Many historians agree. In a joint letter to the SBOE on April 13, a group of Texas history professors accused the board of  “distorting the historical record and the functioning of American society.”
Don McLeroy, outgoing board member and leader of the conservative bloc, believes the revisions are unpopular merely “because they challenge the ideology of the left … which is diametrically opposed to the our founding principles.”
With the final approval date looming, however, opponents of the standards are urging lawmakers to ask the board to start over and implement a more inclusive review process.
“We must develop a system,” Haecker said, “ that is based on the best thinking of our teachers and scholars, not the small political muscle of a small group of people.”

---

quote:

---

"Are dinosaurs alive today? Scientists are becoming more convinced of their existence. Have you heard of the 'Loch Ness Monster' in Scotland? 'Nessie' for short has been recorded on sonar from a small submarine, described by eyewitnesses, and photographed by others. Nessie appears to be a plesiosaur.

---

quote:

---

How many are there?

---

quote:

---

What does it eat?

---

quote:

---

Mating habits?

---

quote:

---

Is it indigenous or did it come from somewhere else?

---

quote:

---

Who should say what children learn?

---

quote:

---

It had to come from somewhere else; Loch Ness was only formed 10,000 years ago at the end of the last ice age.

---

quote:

---

Nonsensical, the world is only 6000 years old!

---

quote:

---

moron  (ˈmɔːrɒn)
 
— n
1. a foolish or stupid person
2. a person having an intelligence quotient of between 50 and 70, able to work under supervision
 

---

quote:

---

Both scientific laws and scientific theories are produced from the scientific method through the formation and testing of hypotheses, and can predict the behavior of the natural world. Both are typically well-supported by observations and/or experimental evidence.[23] However, scientific laws are descriptive accounts of how nature will behave under certain conditions.[24] Scientific theories are broader in scope, and give overarching explanations of how nature works and why it exhibits certain characteristics. Theories are supported by evidence from many different sources, and may contain one or several laws.[25]
A common misconception is that scientific theories are rudimentary ideas that will eventually graduate into scientific laws when enough data and evidence has been accumulated. A theory does not change into a scientific law with the accumulation of new or better evidence. A theory will always remain a theory; a law will always remain a law.[23][26]
Theories and laws are also distinct from hypotheses. Unlike hypotheses, theories and laws may be simply referred to as scientific fact.[27][28]

---