Critical Analysis #2 |
when I met my husband |
sympl_gurl Junior Member
since 2006-03-31
Posts 13Texas |
oops [This message has been edited by sympl_gurl (04-08-2006 01:46 PM).] |
||
© Copyright 2006 Emelda Hankins - All Rights Reserved | |||
Essorant Member Elite
since 2002-08-10
Posts 4769Regina, Saskatchewan; Canada |
I didn't find much poetic depth in this. All you have are some words, a rhyme and a period. There isn't any special focus or structure. Indeed the words don't even grammatically make a sentence without a verb. The title also needs capitals. Overall, the lack of grammar and poetic structure makes it read as if it were written without taking much time or critical care. I recommend opening up more about what made these things special. Give it some detail, depth and structure. Poetry, as other artful manners of writing or speaking, is much more than just thought and words. It is a special tradition and structure, with grace and insight. But what you wrote above lacks in all of those. |
||
DavidTheLion Junior Member
since 2006-04-06
Posts 36 |
I disagree...I think sometimes I word is enough to express exactly what we want to say... hmmmm. |
||
MsSouthernOrchid Member
since 2003-07-12
Posts 192 |
? Am I missing something here? |
||
Skippyrick Member
since 2006-05-16
Posts 150Rohnert Park |
hi: Nice word!!! great title. But what I want is more. It is still around, fat or dead? Rick |
||
⇧ top of page ⇧ | ||
All times are ET (US). All dates are in Year-Month-Day format. |