Poetry Workshop |
![]() ![]() |
Legacy (assignment) |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Not A Poet Member Elite
since 1999-11-03
Posts 3885Oklahoma, USA |
Legacy A sailor from the sea of life swept home To rest by Father Time's prevailing wind, A poet penning life's heroic tome No longer searching for its perfect end, My ink well's empty now, no sails to mend, I scribed the verse and raced the final race - There's no remaining contest to contend As I lie now in Mother Earth's embrace. When mourning ends and none recall my face, When I am nothing more than molding clay And left no sign that I passed through this place, To those who may remember, may they say I had no aspiration greater than To earn the epitaph, "There walked a man." |
||
© Copyright 2002 Pete Rawlings - All Rights Reserved | |||
Skyfyre Senior Member
since 1999-08-15
Posts 1906Sitting in Michael's Lap |
Hrm ... not sure if there is limited access to this forum still, but I'll try to sneak this in ... ![]() It's been a while, I am all but a stranger to this place -- ha! I'd be surprised if anyone in Open would even recognize me. Anyway, enough of excuses ... This was wonderful. Your meter was pleasing, your theme well-developed, the couplet was quite impressive. Only suggestion I would have is change "ink well's" to "ink well," but that's just me, I'm not fond of those possesive l'il "s"es. Linda [This message has been edited by Skyfyre (01-11-2002 05:29 PM).] |
||
Elizabeth![]() ![]()
Moderator
Member Ascendant
since 1999-06-07
Posts 6871Minnesota |
Nice work, Pete. I really don't have a critique for you. Loved the sailor theme in this one. ![]() Hi Linda! ![]() God bless America, my home sweet home. [This message has been edited by Elizabeth (01-11-2002 06:06 PM).] |
||
Duncan Member Ascendant
since 2001-08-07
Posts 5455 |
I think I'm begininning to get it. This was so easy to read...though, not so easy to write, I imagine! |
||
Munda Member Elite
since 1999-10-08
Posts 3544The Hague, The Netherlands |
Ahhhh Pete, this is a superb sonnet - great theme, flawless meter - but please do change "well's" to" well". It's the one little thing keeping it from "perfect". Great write! |
||
Dr.Moose1 Member Elite
since 1999-09-05
Posts 3448Bewilderment , USA |
Pete, You'll get no nit picking from me on this one. Great job on an enjoyable read. Doc |
||
Denise
Moderator
Member Seraphic
since 1999-08-22
Posts 22648 |
This is perfection, Pete! Enjoyed! |
||
Titia Geertman Member Ascendant
since 2001-05-07
Posts 5182Netherlands |
I'll second everyone above Titia A rose is a rose is a rose...I guess... |
||
Nan
Administrator
Member Seraphic
since 1999-05-20
Posts 21191Cape Cod Massachusetts USA |
Not a Poet - Pete - A most oxymoronic cognomen if I've EVER seen one.. Pete has developed a wonderful theme - Maintained a perfect rhyme scheme of abab bcbc cdcd ee - along with flawless iambic pentameter... and... He's written his entire sonnet as an extended metaphor, utilizing specific instances of metaphor within, and enjambment in his final couplet... I'm smiling.. ![]() Hey Linda - It's about time we see your smiling face around here.. Hang around, will ya?.. (pssst - Pete - I like your ink well's original rendition - Don't tell Linda, OK?) |
||
Elizabeth Santos Member Rara Avis
since 1999-11-08
Posts 9269Pennsylvania |
SUPERB! bravo! A perfect sonnet in every way WEll written my friend This should be posted in opem18 so more people could read it Liz |
||
Not A Poet Member Elite
since 1999-11-03
Posts 3885Oklahoma, USA |
Thanks so much to all of you, my friends. Glad you enjoyed. It seems that I haven't written one of these in a while so I do appreciate Nan's Workshop doing them this month. Besides that, I haven't been in calss for a while and I missed all the discussions and help in here. And Linda, I think you would still be recognized in Open or anywhere else around here, for that matter. Do hang around a bit. We miss you in CA too. BTW, if the teacher says the contraction is all right then I'm keeping it. ![]() ![]() Oh Liz, I don't think anyone in Open knows me anyway. Thanks again, Pete [This message has been edited by Not A Poet (01-14-2002 12:01 PM).] |
||
Skyfyre Senior Member
since 1999-08-15
Posts 1906Sitting in Michael's Lap |
Heh, I never said the contraction was incorrect, I just said *I* would not have used it. ![]() However, *I* did not write this, I only snuck in uninvited and enjoyed it immensely. I feel like a voyeur ![]() Still excellently done, contraction or no, my friend. ~Linda |
||
Canuckster Member
since 2002-01-09
Posts 285New Mexico, USA |
Dittos on all the accolades. I don't think the contraction is a flaw, but as it is the only instance in the poem and appears unnecessary it probably wouldn't hurt to drop it. |
||
Not A Poet Member Elite
since 1999-11-03
Posts 3885Oklahoma, USA |
Funny, no one seemed to notice the contraction beginning line 7 ![]() And Linda, I knew exactly what you meant. That was not the first time you have explained it to me. ![]() Thanks, Pete |
||
Nan
Administrator
Member Seraphic
since 1999-05-20
Posts 21191Cape Cod Massachusetts USA |
Sorry guys - I don't see either contraction as optional ones... They BOTH abbreviate the word "IS"... inkwell is = inkwell's... and... There is = There's... If you don't use the apostrophe for the contraction, then you've got an extra syllable messing up your meter. Either that or you'd need to readjust your lines completely. I think it's done just the way it needs to be for proper meter... I REALLY think these two contractions are done properly and are indeed necessary for iambic flow...IMHO.. ![]() |
||
![]() ![]() |
⇧ top of page ⇧ |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
All times are ET (US). All dates are in Year-Month-Day format. |