Critical Analysis #1 |
I will always say "she" |
allis4angel Member
since 2001-04-10
Posts 82Portugal |
You’ll never know It’s you I’m talking to I will always say “she” My love for you Is rare and true But it will never be for you I can’t trust you my love So you can’t hurt me I will always say “she” And you will know It’s a true love But it will never be for you I can let you read and hear All the poems and songs I will always say “she” So I can look into your eyes And tell you how much I love her She always will be you You may hug me and dry my tears Every time she hurts me I will always say “she” So I can be close to you My love will never be yours But she always will be you |
||
© Copyright 2001 allis4angel - All Rights Reserved | |||
Kirk T Walker Member
since 2000-01-13
Posts 357Liberty, MO |
I think I get the idea: the speaker writes poetry but refers to the muse as "she" so that the real person can read the poems and not know it is about her. The speaker can share his heartaches and feelings with the person he loves or who is hurting him without them realizing he is in love with them. Interesting concept. Here are my suggestions: I would use a standard rhyme pattern for each stanza or drop the rhyming altogether. Also, I would use more specific imagery. As it is, I get the concept, but I don't see, hear, taste, touch, etc. anything. Disclaimer: The preceding statement is just my opinion. |
||
Not A Poet Member Elite
since 1999-11-03
Posts 3885Oklahoma, USA |
Hi Allis4angel, Welcome to CA. It's good to hear a new voice. I don't have anything to add about your poem at this time but I'm sure you will get other comments. Check your email for a special message. Pete |
||
jenni Member
since 1999-09-11
Posts 478Washington D.C. |
allis4angel-- i really like the idea in this piece, and thought the repetition of "i'll always say 'she'" worked very well. i especially liked the third stanza, the idea of the girl not knowing the guy's poems are for her. very poignant. i think the piece would be much more effective, however, if you particularized it more, including both more physical details and interesting imagery. i agree with kirk here; make the reader see, hear, feel, taste the experience. it doesn't have to be anything really elaborate. where is the speaker when he is singing the songs or reading the poems to the girl? what are the girl's eyes like, what do they make you think of when she's looking at you and listening to you say you love her, only she doesn't know you mean her? make the reader part of the entire experience. i'd try to stay away from cliched phrases like "hug me and dry my tears," for example; while there's nothing wrong with being simple and heartfelt, i think there are more interesting ways to express this. i agree with kirk, too, about either having a consistent rhythm and rhyme scheme, or scrapping it altogether. anyway, this was a great start, i'd love to read a revision of this. thanks for posting it here! jenni |
||
⇧ top of page ⇧ | ||
All times are ET (US). All dates are in Year-Month-Day format. |