Philosophy 101 |
Simply accept it, do not try to prove it |
icebox Member Elite
since 2003-05-03
Posts 4383in the shadows |
Any teleological argument supporting the existence of god assumes the existence of god, a sentient force, as a source of order and of purpose, as the base of the argument. As such, it is logically absurd. |
||
© Copyright 2011 icebox - All Rights Reserved | |||
Brad Member Ascendant
since 1999-08-20
Posts 5705Jejudo, South Korea |
Well, um, no. Teleology does not mean tautology. True, it's not a logical argument. It is an argument from analogy. Does the universe look like it has purpose (telos)? My point is that it does not. As we understand it today, it does not show purpose and it certainly doesn't show purpose for us. The Earth, our home, is not designed for us, we are lucky to be alive to be honest. |
||
Stephanos
since 2000-07-31
Posts 3618Statesboro, GA, USA |
quote: That's because order and purpose, as we know it in practical terms, always comes from intelligence. This is inference to the best explanation, though not a syllogism, as Brad pointed out. (But I've got one question, if this is about the Teleological Argument for God's existence- There's already a thread for that, so why this and not just a reply?) Stephen |
||
⇧ top of page ⇧ | ||
All times are ET (US). All dates are in Year-Month-Day format. |