navwin » Discussion » The Alley » Interesting Scenario
The Alley
Post A Reply Post New Topic Interesting Scenario Go to Previous / Newer Topic Back to Topic List Go to Next / Older Topic
Balladeer
Administrator
Member Empyrean
since 1999-06-05
Posts 25505
Ft. Lauderdale, Fl USA

0 posted 2011-04-09 04:24 PM


http://www.canada.com/mobile/story.html?id=403d90d6-7a61-41ac-8cef-902a1d14879d&k=14984


Thoughts?

© Copyright 2011 Michael Mack - All Rights Reserved
Denise
Moderator
Member Seraphic
since 1999-08-22
Posts 22648

1 posted 2011-04-09 07:16 PM


Unbelievable. But what isn't nowadays?

Who signed this on behalf of the U.S. and who authorized them to sign this on behalf of the U.S.? Does our Constitution mean nothing, nothing at all, anymore?

I would like to move to an island somewhere where politicians, 'leaders', tyrants, and dictators are forbidden.

Uncas
Member
since 2010-07-30
Posts 408

2 posted 2011-04-09 07:43 PM



quote:
Who signed this on behalf of the U.S


My guess would be George Bush.

.

Balladeer
Administrator
Member Empyrean
since 1999-06-05
Posts 25505
Ft. Lauderdale, Fl USA
3 posted 2011-04-09 07:54 PM


yes, it goes back...what I'm curious about is how it is to be interpreted.
Uncas
Member
since 2010-07-30
Posts 408

4 posted 2011-04-09 08:10 PM



Well having just read the plan the Governments of Canada or the US would instigate a request for assistance in the event of a civil emergency for example  earthquakes, floods, forest fires or the aftermath of a terrorist attack.

Sounds pretty sensible to me.

Well done Mr. Bush.


Denise
Moderator
Member Seraphic
since 1999-08-22
Posts 22648

5 posted 2011-04-09 08:16 PM


What about those infamous loopholes that seem to always pop up in legislation. Is it possible they could be found in this too?
Balladeer
Administrator
Member Empyrean
since 1999-06-05
Posts 25505
Ft. Lauderdale, Fl USA
6 posted 2011-04-09 08:22 PM


such as.....?

Civil disturbances. Group acts of violence and disorders prejudicial to public law and order within the 50 States, District of Columbia, Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, U.S. possessions and territories, or any political subdivision thereof. The term civil disturbance includes all domestic conditions requiring the use of Federal Armed Forces, as more specifically defined in DoD Directive 3025.12.5 http://law.justia.com/cfr/title32/32-1.1.1.9.87.html

Uncas
Member
since 2010-07-30
Posts 408

7 posted 2011-04-09 08:33 PM



There are always loopholes Denise and there are some in this plan, one of them is with regard to who can actually instigate the request. It's designed with all scenarios in mind, including an attack on the government itself so the powers, at first glance, seem to be spread out across several branches of government.

That's not worrying in and of itself though. You'd need to be a seriously hardcore conspiracy theorist to come up with a scenario where this could be used for nefarious purposes.

.

Balladeer
Administrator
Member Empyrean
since 1999-06-05
Posts 25505
Ft. Lauderdale, Fl USA
8 posted 2011-04-09 09:00 PM


....or a national uprising.
Denise
Moderator
Member Seraphic
since 1999-08-22
Posts 22648

9 posted 2011-04-09 10:04 PM


That imaginary island sounds more and more appealing.
serenity blaze
Member Empyrean
since 2000-02-02
Posts 27738

10 posted 2011-04-09 10:49 PM


This could be a good thing, or a bad thing, depending on the circumstances.

Let's hope the theory is never tested.

I'm gonna go watch House.


Huan Yi
Member Ascendant
since 2004-10-12
Posts 6688
Waukegan
11 posted 2011-04-09 11:35 PM


.


This is nothing.


.

Bob K
Member Elite
since 2007-11-03
Posts 4208

12 posted 2011-04-11 12:20 PM



     The posse commitatus law lapsed during the Bush administration, if I understand correctly.  We were not allowed to use Umited States troops against United States citizens, in part as a reaction to some of the events around the civil war.

     This law, as I understand it, allows us to get around the law, now lapsed, in an even more direct fashion, by using Canadian troops.

     I am somewhat hazy about all this, so I urge anybody interested to do their own research.  I believe it's part of the attack on civil liberties and civil protections against government incursions against the population by the government over the past 30 or 40 years.  

     I really would rather that everybody simply take me as a nut-case on this, however, and do their own research to confirm or disconfirm my conjectures.  I would frankly rather be completely wrong about this in every particular than be right in the least.

Balladeer
Administrator
Member Empyrean
since 1999-06-05
Posts 25505
Ft. Lauderdale, Fl USA
13 posted 2011-04-11 07:49 AM


Yes, Bob, it DOES allow the gov't to get around the law, as well as organizing civilian militia does.

You are right to be concerned. Thank you.

Balladeer
Administrator
Member Empyrean
since 1999-06-05
Posts 25505
Ft. Lauderdale, Fl USA
14 posted 2011-04-11 07:49 AM


Serenity......HOUSE for president, I say!!
moonbeam
Deputy Moderator 1 TourDeputy Moderator 1 TourDeputy Moderator 1 TourDeputy Moderator 1 Tour
Member Elite
since 2005-12-24
Posts 2356

15 posted 2011-04-11 11:25 AM


There are always loopholes Denise ...

The size of a handy loophole is directly proportional to the diameter of your gun barrel.

Post A Reply Post New Topic ⇧ top of page ⇧ Go to Previous / Newer Topic Back to Topic List Go to Next / Older Topic
All times are ET (US). All dates are in Year-Month-Day format.
navwin » Discussion » The Alley » Interesting Scenario

Passions in Poetry | pipTalk Home Page | Main Poetry Forums | 100 Best Poems

How to Join | Member's Area / Help | Private Library | Search | Contact Us | Login
Discussion | Tech Talk | Archives | Sanctuary