The Alley |
Supreme Court |
Huan Yi Member Ascendant
since 2004-10-12
Posts 6688Waukegan |
. Should the intent of the original lawmakers be critical to the decisions of the Supreme Court or should it be at liberty to reinterpret the words so as creates regardless a new understanding and new law? . |
||
© Copyright 2008 John Pawlik - All Rights Reserved | |||
Ron
Administrator
Member Rara Avis
since 1999-05-19
Posts 8669Michigan, US |
Yes |
||
Essorant Member Elite
since 2002-08-10
Posts 4769Regina, Saskatchewan; Canada |
Ron said it all in one syllable |
||
Huan Yi Member Ascendant
since 2004-10-12
Posts 6688Waukegan |
. To an either or question, Ron answered yes. ? . |
||
Brad Member Ascendant
since 1999-08-20
Posts 5705Jejudo, South Korea |
It's the perfect answer, John. The only thing I'm upset about is that I didn't get a chance to do it. |
||
Bob K Member Elite
since 2007-11-03
Posts 4208 |
Dear John, When you demand a yes/no answer to a question with a spectrum of plausible, and responsible answers you are attempting to create a false dichotomy. This is a form, I believe, of "begging the question," which demands an answer based on a debatable or even false premise; by giving any answer at all, it sounds as though you agree with the premise. Ron has given you one of the few sensible answers that taste allows. Why do you find that upsetting? |
||
⇧ top of page ⇧ | ||
All times are ET (US). All dates are in Year-Month-Day format. |