Critical Analysis #2 |
Rauschenberg's Goat. |
oceanvu2 Senior Member
since 2007-02-24
Posts 1066Santa Monica, California, USA |
Rauschenberg's Goat Shall I compare thee to Rauschenberg’s goat With its car tire collar and painted fur coat? Nay, even the splatters on Rauschenberg’s floor Pale when compared with the one I adore. Shall I compare thee to Chaim Soutine’s boeuf? The splayed hanging carcass is hardly enough! Nay, when love colors the one I adore She o'er-glistens the dead cow some ten times or more. Shall I compare thee to Brancusi’s “Kiss” When the stony embrace signals something’s amiss? Nay, the pressed lips of the one I adore Soften, melt, open, demand, and explore. Shall I compare thee to Munch’s “The Scream,” Neurotic precursor to Culkin’s worst dream? Nay, when love’s apex consumes my adored “The Scream” seems a murmur of someone who’s bored. I shall compare thee to Mondrian’s “Jazz.” You are vibrant, and lively, and full of pizzazz! [This message has been edited by oceanvu2 (04-20-2007 06:30 PM).] |
||
© Copyright 2007 Jim Aitken - All Rights Reserved | |||
sampo Member
since 2007-02-25
Posts 54oz |
ocean - clever, fun play on billy's sonnet. i'm no expert on sonnet form, nor what types of liberties contemporary poets have taken with them, ( this has an extra strophe, so i'm not sure if it can be judged according to a form ) rgardless i would prefer this to follow an iambic pentameter, such as shakespeares. such as it is, it doesn't maintain the five metrical feet, that is following unaccented/accented syllables. even a basic syllable count shows that you have exceeded on several lines, which interferes with the read for me. as to the content, i really enjoyed the comparisons - particulary munch's scream, a personal fav. and there seems to me a good blend of archaic language mixed with a more modern take on imagry, which generally i would oppose, but in the context of a satire, i think it works really well. regards, sampo. |
||
oceanvu2 Senior Member
since 2007-02-24
Posts 1066Santa Monica, California, USA |
Hi -- I didn't think I was writing a sonnet, it just seemed like sixteen lines was almost enough, already. I didn't think in terms of a "strophe" either. I thought in terms of a reasonable conclusion. As to the ragged meter -- which is either more ragged or less ragged, according to how you read it -- raggedness is appropriate to doggerel. Doggerel is a poetic form using rhymed couplets with wit, and is almost universally despised by poetic type poets, mostly because it's written by folks who don't know that they are writing doggerel and aren't very witty. On the other hand, there was Ogden Nash. (This is from memory, so it's probably a bit off): A one L lama is a priest. A two L llama is a beast. But I will bet a silk pajama You've never seen a threelama. "Casey At The Bat," and "Twinkle twinkle little bat..." also fit the form. Thanks for noticing it was satirical. Jim |
||
⇧ top of page ⇧ | ||
All times are ET (US). All dates are in Year-Month-Day format. |