How to Join Member's Area Private Library Search Today's Topics p Login
Main Forums Discussion Tech Talk Mature Content Archives
   Nav Win
 Discussion
 Philosophy 101
 Maths
 1 2
Follow us on Facebook

 Moderated by: Ron   (Admins )

 
User Options
Format for Better Printing EMail to a Friend Not Available
Admin Print Send ECard
Passions in Poetry

Maths

 Post A Reply Post New Topic   Go to the Next Oldest/Previous Topic Return to Topic Page Go to the Next Newest Topic 
Brad
Member Ascendant
since 08-20-99
Posts 5896
Jejudo, South Korea


0 posted 04-14-2006 08:00 PM       View Profile for Brad   Email Brad   Edit/Delete Message      Find Poems  View IP for Brad

http://web.maths.unsw.edu.au/~norman/views2.htm

I am woefully inadequate to address these issues so I hope someone else with more experience in this field than I have will take it on.

My first thought was that it reads pretty much like the complaints against English departments and literary theory. My second thought was that the problems discussed are the same in any field that I've actually done anything in (literature, Asian Studies, EFL/ESL education).

A few stand out quotes for me:


quote:
Set theory as presented to young people simply doesn't make sense, and the resultant approach to real numbers is in fact a joke! You heard it correctly---and I will try to explain shortly. The point here is that these logically dubious topics are slipped into the curriculum in an off-hand way when students are already overworked and awed by all the other material before them. There is not the time to ruminate and discuss the uncertainties of generations gone by. With a slick enough presentation, the whole thing goes down just like any other of the subjects they are struggling to learn. From then on till their retirement years, mathematicians have a busy schedule ahead of them, ensuring that few get around to critically examining the subject matter of their student days.


quote:
Elementary mathematics needs to be understood in the right way, and the entire subject needs to be rebuilt so that it makes complete sense right from the beginning, without any use of dubious philosophical assumptions about infinite sets or procedures. Show me one fact about the real world (i.e. applied maths, physics, chemistry, biology, economics etc.) that truly requires mathematics involving `infinite sets'! Mathematics was always really about, and always will be about, finite collections, patterns and algorithms. All those theories, arguments and daydreams involving `infinite sets' need to be recast into a precise finite framework or relegated to philosophy. Sure it's more work, just as developing Schwartz's theory of distributions is more work than talking about the delta function as `a function with total integral one that is zero everywhere except at one point where it is infinite'. But Schwartz's clarification inevitably led to important new applications and insights.

If such an approach had been taken in the twentieth century, then (at the very least) two important consequences would have ensued. First of all, mathematicians would by now have arrived at a reasonable consensus of how to formulate elementary and high school mathematics in the right way. The benefits to mathematics education would have been profound. We would have strong positions and reasoned arguments from which to encourage educators to adopt certain approaches and avoid others, and students would have a much more sensible, uniform and digestible subject.

The second benefit would have been that our ties to computer science would be much stronger than they currently are. If we are ever going to get serious about understanding the continuum---and I strongly feel we should---then we must address the critical issue of how to specify and handle the computational procedures that determine points (i.e. decimal expansions). There is no avoiding the development of an appropriate theory of algorithms. How sad that mathematics lost the interesting and important subdiscipline of computer science largely because we preferred convenience to precision!



So, is it time to rethink how we teach mathematics and, if Wildberger is right, perhaps open the field to more and better mathematicians?

Not A Poet
Member Elite
since 11-03-1999
Posts 4427
Oklahoma, USA


1 posted 04-14-2006 08:45 PM       View Profile for Not A Poet   Email Not A Poet   Edit/Delete Message      Find Poems   Click to visit Not A Poet's Home Page   View IP for Not A Poet

Good questions Brad. Without concrete suggestions though, it sounds more like blowing smoke to me. It is true, of course, that 99% or more of the people will never need to deal with infinite sets or number theory but I do remember that those subjects came in quite useful in studying other aspects of math.

It has been 40 or so years since my degrees in math and physics and I have never worked directly as either so have forgotten much of what I learned. Those more esoteric fields were the first to go.

We could, of course, devote more time and effort to applied mathematics and numerical analysis as those fit more closely with modern computers. In fact, nearly all computer math falls in those categories. I have done much of that over the years.

For a theoretical mathemetician, however, numeric analysis is rarely "fun." To be sure, there can be a great challenge in directing the computer how to solve a complex differential equation but it is more akin to supervising the assembly line rather than designing the automobile.

I might agree that the general student need not learn of infinite sets and number theory but for the student aspiring to mathemetics, nothing could be more wrong. Although I have lost most of what I once knew due to lack of use, I could not imagine a mathemetician who did not have a thorough background in such subjects. Those are the seeds from which new knowledge is spawned.
Essorant
Member Elite
since 08-10-2002
Posts 4689
Regina, Saskatchewan; Canada


2 posted 04-19-2006 01:04 AM       View Profile for Essorant   Email Essorant   Edit/Delete Message      Find Poems   Click to visit Essorant's Home Page   View IP for Essorant

Where's Ron?  
 
 Post A Reply Post New Topic   Go to the Next Oldest/Previous Topic Return to Topic Page Go to the Next Newest Topic 
All times are ET (US) Top
  User Options
>> Discussion >> Philosophy 101 >> Maths Format for Better Printing EMail to a Friend Not Available
Print Send ECard

 

pipTalk Home Page | Main Poetry Forums

How to Join | Member's Area / Help | Private Library | Search | Contact Us | Today's Topics | Login
Discussion | Tech Talk | Archives | Sanctuary



© Passions in Poetry and netpoets.com 1998-2013
All Poetry and Prose is copyrighted by the individual authors