How to Join Member's Area Private Library Search Today's Topics p Login
Main Forums Discussion Tech Talk Mature Content Archives
   Nav Win
 Philosophy 101
 Labelling Atheism   [ Page: 1  2  3  4  ]
 75 76 77
Follow us on Facebook

 Moderated by: Ron   (Admins )

User Options
Format for Better Printing EMail to a Friend Not Available
Admin Print Send ECard
Passions in Poetry

Labelling Atheism

 Post A Reply Post New Topic   Go to the Next Oldest/Previous Topic Return to Topic Page Go to the Next Newest Topic 
Deputy Moderator 1 Tour
Member Elite
since 07-31-2000
Posts 3496
Statesboro, GA, USA

75 posted 02-11-2006 01:10 AM       View Profile for Stephanos   Email Stephanos   Edit/Delete Message      Find Poems   Click to visit Stephanos's Home Page   View IP for Stephanos

Are all people equally as good if they do equally good things? Or are you saying that a particular religious belief raises one above the others.

I'm sure you know that, as a Christian, I believe that Righteousness before God is only obtained through Jesus Christ.  This kind of "goodness" is a passive, legal kind of Righteousness (for lack of better terms), in the sense that it doesn't come from Christians themselves, but from Christ.  If this is so, then no amount of "good deeds" can commend any before God as righteous.  Because all of us have sin in our very deepest nature.  

But in addition to this passive righteousness, there is the fact that true faith in Christ produces a better more virtuous life, in the here and now.  This is not a goodness that obtains salvation, but a goodness which is an outflow of gratitude and reverence to God who has given salvation freely.  This is where faith demostrates works.    

That doesn't make a mere belief, the source of a more virtuous life, but rather the object of that belief, the person of Christ.  I have to make that distinction because, admittedly, if it were only a group of people claiming to be "better" because of a mere intellectual belief, that would be unwarranted arrogance.  But the belief in Christ, as a personal savior, entails another person's righteousness.  And with that comes the awareness of one's own sinfulness.  There is a real brokenness and humility that inevitably comes with being a Christian, that should leave no room for personal pride and arrogance.  I know what I am without him, and it's all right there ready to overwhelm me, whenever I would stray.      

Of course, the difficulty with speaking to a non-believer like yourself, is that it's hard for you to even imagine that my relationship with Christ is anything more than an intellectual belief.  If you think I'm duped, you can't even grant me that, theoretically.  So our precommitments color our judgements.  I can only describe these things to you, and listen to you in turn.  Of course, I believe that there is a part of you which in some way, or at sometime has acknowledged God.  And believing that God himself, must ultimately reveal this truth in full (in his own time), I do not feel that I must rely on my own persuasions to convince you.  But I said all of this to say, the precommitments of belief (either way) brings the believer and unbeliever to an impasse.  I guess my only advantage is that I believe God to be on both sides of the chasm.    

Now you are sure Ė true believers arenít true believers if they do bad things, true believers canít have blood on their hands.

I'm not sure that true believers can't have blood on their hands.  I'm not the judge.  But I do believe that true believers will not continue habitually and unchangingly in those kinds of behaviors.  The Bible tells us that determined, unrepentant, habitual sin, is a proof of one's "faith" being unreal, and unsaving in nature.  Profession of belief in Christ, is not enough, that's for sure.  My priority of concern for that application, as the safest approach spirtually, is myself.  I do want to always make sure I'm right, in my own spirit, with God ... lest I go correcting others in hypocritical kind of way.

Itís easy to extrapolate from that and say that religion is the cause of such acts; fortunately we have a control group who arenít religious Ė Atheists. We could add weight to our argument that religion increases the chance of such acts if we can prove that Atheists are less likely to commit them. Hereís the rub though, religious people tend to deny that the perpetrators were truly religious.

I don't know if you fully understand my position here.  I believe that cause of evil actions, is the indwelling sinful nature of us all.  Atheists and religious alike have this problem.  But from a Christian standpoint, atheism and false religious doctrine aggravate and perpetuate the problem.  This would explain why atheists are not less likely to commit atrocities.  Atheism, like false-religion, involves wrong assumptions which may lead to the encouragement of such behavior.  

Now here's a difficulty I admit:  even true doctrine, which repudiates these kinds of actions, is not a guarantee to good behavior.  That is the "law" aspect of Christianity.  Much of it may be believed, without any kind of moral transformation, without any real commitment to follow and do what is right.  There ARE false believers.  If this clouds the issue, then other landmarks must be observed.  But, alas, even the truth may be held insincerely.  

Now, do I think someone is more likely to live a morally upright life, if they know and believe the truth?  Of course I do.  

All of this, leads me to believe that:

1) The Fall of Man is reality, and religious and irreligious alike suffer the malady of sin.

2) Even people who believe wrong doctrines, do "good".  Being made in the image of God, they retain a desire for "goodness", and a capcity for common goodwill toward their fellows.

3) Knowing true doctrine intellectually is no guarantee to spiritual transformation, and a morally upright life.  Though such knowledge is important, there is more to it.

4) True doctrine is a help toward spiritual transformation, salvation, and a morally upright life.  

More later,

Senior Member
since 06-21-2005
Posts 679
Pittsburgh, Pa

76 posted 02-11-2006 01:47 AM       View Profile for JesusChristPose   Email JesusChristPose   Edit/Delete Message      Find Poems  View IP for JesusChristPose

I think a good question would be this:

How many Christians would still keep their faith if they were not promised an afterlife for obeying their Lord?

hmmmm... the second question would be how many Christians would honestly answer that question?

"If this grand panaorama before me is what you call God... then God is not dead."

Member Elite
since 08-10-2002
Posts 4689
Regina, Saskatchewan; Canada

77 posted 02-11-2006 12:36 PM       View Profile for Essorant   Email Essorant   Edit/Delete Message      Find Poems   Click to visit Essorant's Home Page   View IP for Essorant


But can't that question be adjusted for almost anything in life?  How many would do anything they're doing - including sitting in front of the computer right now - if they didn't get some sort of relief or satisfaction out of it?  

 Post A Reply Post New Topic   Go to the Next Oldest/Previous Topic Return to Topic Page Go to the Next Newest Topic 
All times are ET (US) Top
  User Options
>> Discussion >> Philosophy 101 >> Labelling Atheism   [ Page: 1  2  3  4  ] Format for Better Printing EMail to a Friend Not Available
Print Send ECard


pipTalk Home Page | Main Poetry Forums

How to Join | Member's Area / Help | Private Library | Search | Contact Us | Today's Topics | Login
Discussion | Tech Talk | Archives | Sanctuary

© Passions in Poetry and 1998-2013
All Poetry and Prose is copyrighted by the individual authors