navwin » Discussion » Philosophy 101 » what is reality
Philosophy 101
Post A Reply Post New Topic what is reality Go to Previous / Newer Topic Back to Topic List Go to Next / Older Topic
Vagabond
Member
since 2004-01-23
Posts 163


0 posted 2004-02-17 08:11 AM



What is reality? How do you know we are real? Is this just a very good dream and that this fourm and all the people will vanish when i awake? I'm i real? Are you?

Vagabon the Lost One

© Copyright 2004 Jerome Hollon - All Rights Reserved
Stephanos
Deputy Moderator 1 Tour
Member Elite
since 2000-07-31
Posts 3618
Statesboro, GA, USA
1 posted 2004-02-17 03:04 PM


If you're not real, why should I answer you?
And if I'm not real, why should you want an answer?



Stephen

Susan Caldwell
Member Rara Avis
since 2002-12-27
Posts 8348
Florida
2 posted 2004-02-17 03:09 PM


Three teenagers..

Two cats...

10 loads of laundry...

2 litter boxes..

and enough energy to cry about it all.

Vagabond
Member
since 2004-01-23
Posts 163

3 posted 2004-02-17 03:21 PM


may i ask about the last reply?
I'm not going to answer the first one



Vagabon the Lost One

jbouder
Member Elite
since 1999-09-18
Posts 2534
Whole Sort Of Genl Mish Mash
4 posted 2004-02-17 03:43 PM


Stephan:

I guess that means you're not real, dude.  Bummer. By the way ... you have the most impressive word-count-to-post ratio I've ever seen in someone who doesn't really exist.  

Vagabond:

Regarding Susan's post, it's something you have to experience to truly appreciate.  

In answer to your post, I would ask how knowing whether or not I am real really changes anything.  As to whether or not I think you're real, I believe you're real enough for me to reply to your post.

Jim

Severn
Member Rara Avis
since 1999-07-17
Posts 7704

5 posted 2004-02-17 04:16 PM


And ultimately what does it matter? It's something we can't answer isn't it. I mean...we've likely all heard the 'what if we're just someone's dream' theory, or someone's joke. (Many people supply God as the 'someone') The thing is, even if we aren't real we won't know until the bubble bursts - if it ever should. And then we'll be nothing maybe, so we won't know. Or we'll be the products of a new dream, and we won't know. Or there might be some other fate in wait for us...

Damn...it all feels very fatalistic. Thing is, life feels real enough to me right now, with all it's attendants joys and hurts. Go outside on a summer day, alone, into the trees. And just rest. Or float in the ocean, staring at the sky and clouds. Although that sounds all airy-fairy, you might find an answer.

K

Vagabond
Member
since 2004-01-23
Posts 163

6 posted 2004-02-17 06:17 PM


all irelivate(sorry even spell check don't recognize it)

Vagabon the Lost One

jbouder
Member Elite
since 1999-09-18
Posts 2534
Whole Sort Of Genl Mish Mash
7 posted 2004-02-18 12:22 PM


quote:
all irelivate


Exactly - your questions have little practical value and are irrelevant to everyday life.  That, I think, is the point most of us were trying to make.

If you discover your self is the only reality, and take offense to what I have just written, then you have essentially offended yourself and can't really be justified in feeling any indignation.  The only real use of Egoism is as a means of escape from moral responsibility for one's actions.

Something Susan didn't mention, but about which I believe she would agree with me, is that our view of self changes when we become parents.  Responsibility for the care and well-being of another - sometimes at the expense of our personal wants and desires and also, at times, requiring significant sacrifice - has a persistant way of reminding you that there is more to life than self.

Jim

Susan Caldwell
Member Rara Avis
since 2002-12-27
Posts 8348
Florida
8 posted 2004-02-18 01:02 PM


Those things I said above...

those are reality.

As Jim said, children seem to define life, hence reality.

I don't know if you actually wanted a real answer to your question.  I mean those are the kind of questions I asked myself when I was a kid..

I don't need to now, life's emotional roller coaster is the pinch...

"sit on top of the world and tell me how you feel...'cause what you feel is what I feel for you.."
~Dido~

Essorant
Member Elite
since 2002-08-10
Posts 4769
Regina, Saskatchewan; Canada
9 posted 2004-02-18 04:23 PM


There is only one thing that is not real.  

Christopher
Moderator
Member Rara Avis
since 1999-08-02
Posts 8296
Purgatorial Incarceration
10 posted 2004-02-18 05:21 PM


I think something unreal cannot exist.
Essorant
Member Elite
since 2002-08-10
Posts 4769
Regina, Saskatchewan; Canada
11 posted 2004-02-19 12:44 PM


Unreality has to unreal to be real, that is the one exception I think
Vagabond
Member
since 2004-01-23
Posts 163

12 posted 2004-02-19 08:04 AM


the disregard everything i say for they are all lies


Vagabon the Lost One

Christopher
Moderator
Member Rara Avis
since 1999-08-02
Posts 8296
Purgatorial Incarceration
13 posted 2004-02-19 10:30 AM


"Unreality" IS real.

The moment you conceive of something, it becomes real, even if only as a concept.

Jason Lyle
Senior Member
since 2003-02-07
Posts 1438
With my darkling
14 posted 2004-02-19 11:12 AM


answer the first reply, and presto, you have your answer.

Jason

jbouder
Member Elite
since 1999-09-18
Posts 2534
Whole Sort Of Genl Mish Mash
15 posted 2004-02-19 11:12 AM


But "unreality" isn't "real" in the same sense my half-full, luke-warm cup of coffee is real.  "Unreality" has no objective character - in fact, I would say you'd have to twist the definition of "real" in order to call the "unreal" real.  You may be able to conceptualize the "unreal" in your mind, but that doesn't make it "real" in the philosophical or actual senses.

Jim

Susan Caldwell
Member Rara Avis
since 2002-12-27
Posts 8348
Florida
16 posted 2004-02-19 11:27 AM


Can I get some of that luke warm coffee?


jbouder
Member Elite
since 1999-09-18
Posts 2534
Whole Sort Of Genl Mish Mash
17 posted 2004-02-19 11:42 AM


Might be cold by the time it makes it down to the land of dimpled chads.
Susan Caldwell
Member Rara Avis
since 2002-12-27
Posts 8348
Florida
18 posted 2004-02-19 12:25 PM


I can nuke it.

*pouting* why must a bare the burden of those insufferable chads?

The lady that took my order at the sandwich shop looked and talked like a friend that died a couple of months ago....more reality.

Christopher
Moderator
Member Rara Avis
since 1999-08-02
Posts 8296
Purgatorial Incarceration
19 posted 2004-02-19 12:36 PM


Jim - But what is that cup of coffee other than a concept in your mind? Do your hands really feel the cup? Or does you brain tell you that they are feeling it?

Even what is normally considered "solidity" is still a concept that is tucked away in that big brain of yours.

Why is something you can't touch less real than your cup of coffee? You can't touch protons, neutrons, love, etc., so are they less real for being a concept rather than a physical "reality"?

jbouder
Member Elite
since 1999-09-18
Posts 2534
Whole Sort Of Genl Mish Mash
20 posted 2004-02-19 01:19 PM


Christopher:

The difference, again, is the objective character.  My secretary can see my coffee cup, and that it is half full.  She can touch the cup and feel that the contents are no longer hot.  The attorney in the office next door can do the same thing.

Let's say now that, instead of the cup of coffee, I say, "There is a jack-o-lope sitting on my desk." Jack-o-lopes are imaginary, and have no objective character - that is, my secretary, or the attorney in the next office, cannot experience the imaginary jack-o-lope with their senses.

quote:
Why is something you can't touch less real than your cup of coffee? You can't touch protons, neutrons, love, etc., so are they less real for being a concept rather than a physical "reality"?


The existence of protons and neutrons is verifiable - emotions are internal states that are normally only observable by others by how those emotions cause us to behave.  But, assuming we consider observable behavior to be outward manifestations of our internal states, then I don't have a problem with emotions being real.  If we can ascertain the existence of black holes by observing the effect they have on their surroundings, then I see no reason why the same cannot be true for emotions.

Jim


Sudhir Iyer
Member Ascendant
since 2000-04-26
Posts 6943
Mumbai, India : now in Belgium
21 posted 2004-02-19 01:44 PM


TV?

a word in the dictionary?

a noun?

from dictionary.com

re·al·i·ty    

The quality or state of being actual or true.

One, such as a person, an entity, or an event, that is actual: “the weight of history and political realities” (Benno C. Schmidt, Jr.).

The totality of all things possessing actuality, existence, or essence.

That which exists objectively and in fact: Your observations do not seem to be about reality.

from acronym finder

R E A L I T Y: Rhymes Equal Actual Life in the Youth  

Vagabond
Member
since 2004-01-23
Posts 163

22 posted 2004-02-19 03:40 PM


with in the nutshell there is a nut, dido with questions

Vagabon the Lost One

Susan Caldwell
Member Rara Avis
since 2002-12-27
Posts 8348
Florida
23 posted 2004-02-19 03:53 PM


Okay, I know this one...

it's like those IQ test questions...

blue is to sky as green is to ______.

so okay if there is a nut within a nut shell then there is a quest within a question???

Did I get it??????


Christopher
Moderator
Member Rara Avis
since 1999-08-02
Posts 8296
Purgatorial Incarceration
24 posted 2004-02-19 04:18 PM


Interesting points, Jim.
quote:
But, assuming we consider observable behavior to be outward manifestations of our internal states, then I don't have a problem with emotions being real.
Then would the recognition of an unreal object fall into this same category? We can discuss a jack-a-lope, even recognizing its "non-existence", all while exhibiting behaviour spurred by said discussion. If emotions are recognized as real by the connected behaviour, isn't this the same? (I think I just repeated myself...)

Essorant
Member Elite
since 2002-08-10
Posts 4769
Regina, Saskatchewan; Canada
25 posted 2004-02-19 04:26 PM


"Unreality" IS real."

I agree with you because everything is real.  
But the very thing that makes unreality real is its being unreal.  

jbouder
Member Elite
since 1999-09-18
Posts 2534
Whole Sort Of Genl Mish Mash
26 posted 2004-02-19 05:13 PM


Ess:

1. Everything is real
2. The unreal is part of everything
3. The unreal is real

Doesn't that look a little circular to you?

Chris:

Out of time.  Will get back to you.

Jim

Sunshine
Administrator
Member Empyrean
since 1999-06-25
Posts 63354
Listening to every heart
27 posted 2004-02-19 07:01 PM


Dang.  So the stuffed jack-a-lope I saw in Wall Drug, South Dakota, in 1970 was a figment of my imagination, and not real at all?

Wasn't it really stuffed?  Or did a figment, in this instance, become a non-existant reality?

I touched it.  Saw it.  Had I gotten close enough to smell it, I am sure it would have resembled dust, hair, and dried bone to my olfactory senses.  I didn't hear it make a sound, possibly because it was "scared stiff"...*wink*...

So while I believe I can safely say that I may never see a "real" jack-a-lope in life, I do know jack-a-lopes exist in some form and therefore, makes them "real".

No?


Vagabond
Member
since 2004-01-23
Posts 163

28 posted 2004-02-20 08:18 AM


how do you know that the nut inside the nutshell has not been taken by pest of overgrown tree rats. Or is the nut inside you figment of imagination and not real? Same with the questions

Vagabon the Lost One

Sudhir Iyer
Member Ascendant
since 2000-04-26
Posts 6943
Mumbai, India : now in Belgium
29 posted 2004-02-20 09:44 AM


in each question, there is "u" n "i" and there are long queues as well...

but "i" am not in a nutshell there's only "u"

Susan Caldwell
Member Rara Avis
since 2002-12-27
Posts 8348
Florida
30 posted 2004-02-20 02:51 PM


*sigh*

Let's talk perspective then...

and yes..that is rhetorical.

jbouder
Member Elite
since 1999-09-18
Posts 2534
Whole Sort Of Genl Mish Mash
31 posted 2004-02-20 04:29 PM


Vagabond & Sudhir:

You guys have lost me.  What does any of this have to do with the topic?

Christopher:

Emotions are determants that affect the magnitude, frequency, and intensity of behavior.  In our "verbal behavior" of this thread, we are responding to what one another is writing about jack-a-lopes - not to the jack-a-lopes themselves.

Emotions at an interesting facet to the study of behavior and I'm merely a novice.  So, I suppose I could be wrong.

Sunshine:

See how the definition of "real" gets muddled when we confuse representations of living creatures with the genuine, living articles?

Jim

Cpat Hair
Deputy Moderator 1 Tour
Member Patricius
since 2001-06-05
Posts 11793

32 posted 2004-02-20 04:48 PM


"See how the definition of "real" gets muddled when we confuse representations of living creatures with the genuine, living articles?"

Good point..as no definition of "real" was stated in teh beginning nor was any definition of "unreal". So each persons perception of or understanding of the definition clouds the conversation/debate with no two people assured they are in fact discussing the same concept.

:-)


Sunshine
Administrator
Member Empyrean
since 1999-06-25
Posts 63354
Listening to every heart
33 posted 2004-02-20 05:04 PM



Yup.

Cpat Hair
Deputy Moderator 1 Tour
Member Patricius
since 2001-06-05
Posts 11793

34 posted 2004-02-20 06:16 PM


re·al·i·ty [ ree állətee ] (plural re·al·i·ties)

noun  

1. real existence: actual being or existence, as opposed to an imaginary, idealized, or false nature


2. all that actually exists or happens: everything that actually does or could exist or happen in real life


3. something that exist or happens: something that has real existence and must be dealt with in real life
a vision that ignores the realities of the business world


4. type of existence: a kind of existence or universe, either connected with or independent from other kinds
fantastic notions of alternative realities


5. philosophy totality of real things: the totality of real things in the world, independent of people’s knowledge or perception of them


Which of the definitions are we discussing?

serenity blaze
Member Empyrean
since 2000-02-02
Posts 27738

35 posted 2004-02-20 07:06 PM


Why not discuss 1-4?

Considering the definition of five, I don't think we can discuss it--er, realistically.


Christopher
Moderator
Member Rara Avis
since 1999-08-02
Posts 8296
Purgatorial Incarceration
36 posted 2004-02-20 08:34 PM


Novice? Nah, Jim.

Then - What about the reality of a concept? I know there's a separation here between a solid reality & an emotional reality, and I'd like to throw conceptual reality into the works.

Are there different levels of reality? I'm not thinking so much as different degrees, rather, different types. (Not more, not less, just different).
  • Solid Reality - That which we can interpret with our five senses.
  • Emotional Reality - That which we attribute to (whatever you want to contribute them to... not even going to go there! )
  • Conceptual Reality - That which we can conceive of has its own reality separate from the above two, but still with an existence of its own.
Make any sense? Perhaps "reality" (as mentioned above) is to restrictive of a term?

Christopher
Moderator
Member Rara Avis
since 1999-08-02
Posts 8296
Purgatorial Incarceration
37 posted 2004-02-20 08:37 PM


quote:
five: The cardinal number equal to 4 + 1.

four: The cardinal number equal to 3 + 1.

three: The cardinal number equal to 2 + 1.

two: The cardinal number equal to the sum of 1 + 1.

one: The cardinal number, represented by the symbol 1, designating the first such unit in a series.


I think it would be much more interesting to discuss "one" midi-k.

Essorant
Member Elite
since 2002-08-10
Posts 4769
Regina, Saskatchewan; Canada
38 posted 2004-02-20 08:43 PM


1. Everything is real  √
2. The unreal is part of everything
3. The unreal is real  √

Essorant
Member Elite
since 2002-08-10
Posts 4769
Regina, Saskatchewan; Canada
39 posted 2004-02-20 08:49 PM


"Are there different levels of reality? I'm not thinking so much as different degrees, rather, different types. (Not more, not less, just different).

Christopher,

I think you are on the right track, indeed!

  

serenity blaze
Member Empyrean
since 2000-02-02
Posts 27738

40 posted 2004-02-20 09:01 PM


nodding.

Having just stepped off the Tilt-a-Whirl, I feel I'm hardly qualified to answer the question, but I do love eavesdropping.

OH.

It's not eavesdropping if I keep popping in like this, is it?

I'll be in the back, C--taking notes.

and btw? Thanks for not "dismissing" me for knowing that I do not know.

Yer still a doll.

carry on, good people.

Local Rebel
Member Ascendant
since 1999-12-21
Posts 5767
Southern Abstentia
41 posted 2004-02-20 10:38 PM


Replace 'Solid' with 'Perceptual' Christopher and I'd be more in agreement.
Essorant
Member Elite
since 2002-08-10
Posts 4769
Regina, Saskatchewan; Canada
42 posted 2004-02-20 10:52 PM


Everything is real whether you perceive it or not.

Even this happy face

Local Rebel
Member Ascendant
since 1999-12-21
Posts 5767
Southern Abstentia
43 posted 2004-02-20 10:59 PM


But what you perceive Ess and what I perceive may be completely different things -- which is why -- eyewitness testimony in a court of law is often very inconclusive.

But, when I perceive someone is smiling at me.. I smile back  

Vagabond
Member
since 2004-01-23
Posts 163

44 posted 2004-02-24 08:12 AM


Ess how do you know that everything is real? Is a caleiker real? The caleiker is a part lion part cat that eats dogs that my grandfathre Clienne created in his writeing The Poor Mans Jurnal.

Vagabon the Lost One

jbouder
Member Elite
since 1999-09-18
Posts 2534
Whole Sort Of Genl Mish Mash
45 posted 2004-02-24 11:25 AM


Ess:

If anything is unreal, then everything cannot be real.

#1 is an argument that cannot be sustained without expanding the definition of real to encompass that which has only token or imaginary existence.  #3 is a contradiction.

Here are some common definitions of reality:

1. The quality or state of being actual or true.

2. The totality of all things possessing actuality, existence, or essence.

3. That which exists objectively and in fact: Your observations do not seem to be about reality.

Are you saying everything is actual or true?  Or are you saying that everything possesses either actuality, existence or essence?  Or are you saying that everything exists objectively and in fact?

Or do you define the word "reality" differently from common usage?

Jim

Vagabond
Member
since 2004-01-23
Posts 163

46 posted 2004-02-24 03:39 PM


If nothing is unreal then unreal is not real!

Vagabon the Lost One

Brad
Member Ascendant
since 1999-08-20
Posts 5705
Jejudo, South Korea
47 posted 2004-02-24 10:05 PM


Wow, it's 'existence' all over again. The meaning of a word is dependent on its relationship to other words (Jim, that's just another way of saying how it is used). If you attempt to explain real without reference to unreal, you explain away the utility of the word.

And we still need away to explain the difference between, say, Superman and Christopher Reeves.

  

croyles
Member
since 2004-01-27
Posts 102

48 posted 2004-04-19 06:21 PM


Everybody creates their own reality, yet we all have some of the same reality. Thats how different opinions are created, and years after years we are learning to be tolerant with other peoples point of views.
Post A Reply Post New Topic ⇧ top of page ⇧ Go to Previous / Newer Topic Back to Topic List Go to Next / Older Topic
All times are ET (US). All dates are in Year-Month-Day format.
navwin » Discussion » Philosophy 101 » what is reality

Passions in Poetry | pipTalk Home Page | Main Poetry Forums | 100 Best Poems

How to Join | Member's Area / Help | Private Library | Search | Contact Us | Login
Discussion | Tech Talk | Archives | Sanctuary