How to Join Member's Area Private Library Search Today's Topics p Login
Main Forums Discussion Tech Talk Mature Content Archives
   Nav Win
 Discussion
 Philosophy 101
 Repectful Contempt
 1 2 3 4 5
Follow us on Facebook

 Moderated by: Ron   (Admins )

 
User Options
Format for Better Printing EMail to a Friend Not Available
Admin Print Send ECard
Passions in Poetry

Repectful Contempt

 Post A Reply Post New Topic   Go to the Next Oldest/Previous Topic Return to Topic Page Go to the Next Newest Topic 
Brad
Member Ascendant
since 08-20-99
Posts 5896
Jejudo, South Korea


0 posted 02-03-2004 06:18 PM       View Profile for Brad   Email Brad   Edit/Delete Message      Find Poems  View IP for Brad

Hilary Putnam uses this term in attempting to describe his philosophically fundamental differences between himself and Robert Nozick:

quote:
I want to urge that there is all the difference in the world between an opponent who has the fundamental intellectual virtues of open-mindedness, respect for reason, and self-criticism, and one who does not; between an opponent who has an impressive and pertinent store of factual knowledge, and one who does not; between an opponent who merely gives vent to his feelings and fantasies (which is all people commonly do in what passes for political discussion these days), and one who reasons carefully. And the ambivalent attitude of respectful contempt is an honest one:  respect for the intellectual virtues in the other; contempt for the intellectual and emotional weaknesses (according to one's own lights, of course, for one always starts with them). 'Respectful contempt' may sound almost nasty(especially if one confuses it with contemptuous respect, something quite different).  And it would be nasty if the 'contempt' was for the person, and not just for one complex of feelings and judgements in him.  But it is a far more honest attitude than false relativism; that is, the pretense that there is no giving reasons, or such a thing as better or worse reasons on a subject, when one really does feel that one view is reasonable and the other is irrational.


Reason, Truth, and History, p. 166.

I don't think that this passage is a long winded version of, "I disagree with your opinion, but I respect your right to say it."  That fundamental Liberal point and one I believe in very strongly has (recently? always?) seemed to metamorphized into, "I have a right to an opinion, and you can't tell me I'm wrong." Even in some ways, it seems to have become a way of invalidating the preceding argument, "Well, you have a right to say that, and I respect that but I don't agree with it. "

No, I think the point here is that all opinions are not created equal, but that that equality is not based on what is argued but on how it is argued. Two people with very different opinions can have a substantive, productive discussion regardless of the outcome precisely because of the way it is argued.

The basis for such a discussion are:

openmindedness
--This means the willing to listen to the other side, not blindingly accept the other side. Another way of saying this might be a sympathetic reading or of simply trying to see the other person's point of view. It does not mean that you accept that point of view.

respect for reason
--Reason's a big word and it's often used rhetorically. But I wonder if we can make a distinction between, "It makes sense," and "I agree with that"?  You can't agree or disagree with something that you can't understand.

Self-criticism
--This doesn't mean, "I don't know what I'm talking about, but . . ." It means that given the first two principles, you can reevaluate your arguments even if you don't change your mind. This can hone your own arguments next time around.  


Denise
Moderator
Member Seraphic
since 08-22-99
Posts 23002


1 posted 02-03-2004 07:21 PM       View Profile for Denise   Edit/Delete Message      Find Poems  View IP for Denise

It makes sense to me.
berengar
Member
since 01-02-2004
Posts 61


2 posted 02-04-2004 07:30 AM       View Profile for berengar   Email berengar   Edit/Delete Message      Find Poems  View IP for berengar

Hear hear.  It is possible to make a distinction between the (intrinsic?) value of the person and the quality of the exposition that they present.  Even I've said nonsensical or poorly supported arguments at various times in my life, and the only reason I haven't persisted in various fooleries is because of the feedback from wiser and/or more reasoned heads.  A person is always of value; their opinion must be tested.
Stephanos
Deputy Moderator 1 Tour
Member Elite
since 07-31-2000
Posts 3496
Statesboro, GA, USA


3 posted 02-05-2004 12:31 AM       View Profile for Stephanos   Email Stephanos   Edit/Delete Message      Find Poems   Click to visit Stephanos's Home Page   View IP for Stephanos

Brad,

that's beautiful.


Wish we had more of it, more consistently, here in Philo 101, and in the world.

Stephen.
Opeth
Member Elite
since 12-13-2001
Posts 2224
The Ravines


4 posted 02-05-2004 06:44 AM       View Profile for Opeth   Email Opeth   Edit/Delete Message      Find Poems  View IP for Opeth

Brad,

If one uses those 3 aspects as a basis for discussion, but within his or her mind a decisison has already been made as to said person's correctness - that that person is right, no matter what issue is discussed, then what is the point of discussing a issue other than to try to attempt to change the other person's belief?



"If this grand panorama before me is what you call God...then God is not dead."
jbouder
Member Elite
since 09-18-99
Posts 2641
Whole Sort Of Genl Mish Mash


5 posted 02-05-2004 08:44 AM       View Profile for jbouder   Email jbouder   Edit/Delete Message      Find Poems  View IP for jbouder

quote:
If one uses those 3 aspects as a basis for discussion, but within his or her mind a decisison has already been made as to said person's correctness - that that person is right, no matter what issue is discussed, then what is the point of discussing a issue other than to try to attempt to change the other person's belief?


(1) To sharpen your own reasoning and argumentation skills and (2) to convince those who are undecided.

Brad:

I thought the quotation was excellent also, if not a little wordy.

Jim
 
 Post A Reply Post New Topic   Go to the Next Oldest/Previous Topic Return to Topic Page Go to the Next Newest Topic 
All times are ET (US) Top
  User Options
>> Discussion >> Philosophy 101 >> Repectful Contempt Format for Better Printing EMail to a Friend Not Available
Print Send ECard

 

pipTalk Home Page | Main Poetry Forums

How to Join | Member's Area / Help | Private Library | Search | Contact Us | Today's Topics | Login
Discussion | Tech Talk | Archives | Sanctuary



© Passions in Poetry and netpoets.com 1998-2013
All Poetry and Prose is copyrighted by the individual authors