Saluting with misty eyes
Fine, don't call his show. I can deal with the fallacy of that, without even straining to rectify it within my own feeble brain.
I would, however, point out how the Obama administration is acting like a child feeling abused by his older brother.
When othe 5 year old comes sailing down the stairs crying that the 6 year old is being mean, I- first thing- ask why, and get the response, "She said something mean to me." I next ask, "what did she say?" and get the response, "uh... she said I peed the bed." The thing is, the night before, she had done exactly that.
Now, Fox is being the mean older brother, and the Administration is being the whiney 5 year old complaining that the older brother is telling the truth. Before the left wing contention begins rejecting this premise out of hand, let me ask you this:
Where is the Administration's statements/proof that the original bill was not going to require people to be on the government's health plan? Section 102, Paragraph a, number 1, sub paragraph A of the original bill specifically stated that insurance companies could not write any new business after the first day of the law had taken effect. Sub-paragraph B states that dependants opf people who have health care may be written new business... but not anyone being eligible for new coverage under a new job, or whatever.
Ditto the assertion that the Administration's healthcare plan was going to require taxes on the middle class, and that it was going to not be cost effective at all. Well, new reports are that it is going to cost 1 TRILLION dollars to put the enw plan into effect... and not require a new tax on the middle class???
Fox News is telling the truth, and the Obama administration is complaining that they are doing so... just like my 5 year old.
Life's journey is not to arrive at the grave safely in a well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting, "WHAT A RIDE