"Whoís complaining about one word replies?"
You are. You spelled the word "enjoyed" out in one of your original edits/posts, and in this edit it's addressed in your first question, (in the first part and last part of the compound sentence, to be exact).
and then you address the devaluation and disrespect toward other posters, poets, and work by constantly using that one word reply. I see your point and I addressed that in my post to you, but this has become more complex.
So, alright, now you are more worried about the mass generation of pasted one word replies, and you have calculated how many one can paste in so many seconds.
and then you've figured exactly how far this mass posting makes another poem go down the list.
and then disk space, speed of access, reduced page loading, bandwidth costs, etc.
Wow, Grinch. I've been here almost 8 years, and not once did I ever consider how my reply to someone's poem or post might affect the technical operation of the site. Mainly because I'm not a computer specialist and I still find the internet to be something magical.
I stand, denounced from the mighty halls of CompuTech and bow interminably with respect to this type of knowledge and ability.
All I can do is trust that Ron knows what he's doing and I feel he works very hard to keep things operating smoothly. I also trust that if I did something to upset that or I caused a glitch, he'd notify me.
I donít mind being called names and taking abuse if thatís the cost of raising this issue, which it seems to be, so give it your best shot, youíll have to excuse me if I donít reply in kind though, I donít think itíd add anything to the conversation.
For someone who has been so thorough with the technical aspects & workings of mass one-word posts, why did you not properly read my post?
I never called you any names and I'm sorry my post came across as abusive. I directed the word "Uptight" toward your post, not your person.
So, if I had to think of one word to describe your original post, it would be: Uptight.
I based that word on the tense nature of your post and your replies to others, which seem erratic, shifting, defensive, & stiffly rejecting of any point granted/offered and especially of that of opposing opinion. That's simply my opinion of your offerings, not YOU as a person. And that's why I asked you to loosen up. That didn't mean I didn't support you or your cause at all.
Is it possible you've taken things a little too personally, and even when others have taken the time to reply to you, with sincerity, with an amount of inspection and reading, it's still not good enough to you if one isn't in full agreement, or as rigidly pressed or demanding of a solution.
anyway, email me direct if you wish.
I meant no harm to you or your person and hope you're having a fine day of inspiration.