I’m not sure why you want other women to answer for one woman’s choice of love interest.
Perhaps a more proper title might be: “Women who want America’s Most Wanted.” ???
Otherwise it reads sickly erroneous & offensively generalizing in reference to the content. I was hoping to find a miracle all-you-can-eat Belgian Chocolate that didn’t cause a weight problem in the content, but Noooo. I get some poor excuse for a human being dangled before me like a rotten carrot from hell, and I’m supposed to be the Playboy bunny who wants him as a love toy? Not I!
Maybe some crave jail bird? Convict cuisine? Murderer minestrone? Cell Mate mush?
Aside from any shallow or half-baked answer, who knows exactly why?
Are you angry because some women fish for someone like Tavares instead of someone like you?
What’s horribly unsavory about this headlining travesty upon justice is:
“Tuttman, who was appointed to the bench by former Gov. Mitt Romney, said, “I’m sorry, I’m not able to comment on this.” When informed what the slain woman’s father had said, she repeated, “I’m sorry, I’m not able to comment about this.”BH
"He fled to Washington to marry a woman he met on an online prison dating Web site."BH
The first part of that sentence is poor writing. Tavares never really “fled.” He moseyed, by way of a free pass, and the legal BS surrounding the word fled doesn’t even apply to a man that should never have been released in the first place.
“Superior Court Judge Kathe Tuttman released him on personal recognizance. Tavares was freed and fled the state to marry and live in a Washington trailer with Jennifer Lynn Tavares.” BH
That’s what everyone needs explained.
Tuttman needs to answer for the release and resulting double murder, whether she has a comment or not, but I’m Sure Mitt Romney is issuing damage controllers their BOLO papers for answers that might appease the outraged Mass/es.
TomMark~ “The greatest change: Love becomes his first priority now, than killing.”
Try issuing that statement to the families of the brutally killed newlyweds. Supposedly for $50. What a gross mismark.