navwin » Main Forums » English Workshop » The Problem with Grammar References
English Workshop
Post A Reply Post New Topic The Problem with Grammar References Go to Previous / Newer Topic Back to Topic List Go to Next / Older Topic
Brad
Member Ascendant
since 1999-08-20
Posts 5705
Jejudo, South Korea

0 posted 2001-07-29 04:27 PM


Following the "Problem with Grammar" post, here is another article, I hope people will read and comment on. Eskimos, words, and problems?

Curious if anybody knows the right answer to the question posed here.


http://www.vocabula.com/VRSEPT00Halpern.htm


Thanks,
Brad

[This message has been edited by Brad (edited 07-29-2001).]

© Copyright 2001 Brad - All Rights Reserved
Ron
Administrator
Member Rara Avis
since 1999-05-19
Posts 8669
Michigan, US
1 posted 2001-07-29 06:33 PM


quote:
Curious if anybody knows the right answer to the question posed here.


What question? I don't think I saw any posed…

I haven't previously followed this controversy and hesitate to reach conclusions based only on the viewpoints of one Mark Halpern - but am far less hesitant to express preliminary opinions that are otherwise very much subject to change.

Descriptionists are absolutely wrong. Prescriptionists are mostly wrong. I think we very much need a third choice. How about Inscriptionists?

p.s. If you are using a browser other than IE, you won't be able to access this article. Bad HTML is even more endemic than bad English, it seems. And with much the same results.  

Brad
Member Ascendant
since 1999-08-20
Posts 5705
Jejudo, South Korea
2 posted 2001-07-30 03:36 AM


How many words do 'Eskimos' have for snow?

Halpern seems to be saying thank you for correcting me but still seems to think (given the envoi) that 'Eskimos' still have more words for snow than we do.

In my first year of college, my Cultural Antropology teacher said something like four or five different words for snow. He spent two years there so I figured he'd at least know some of the language.

Why did the mistake occur in the first place?

I've seen this style done a couple of times in articles I agree with somewhat. Sceptics, when preaching to the converted, have a tendency to follow the same path.  I don't like it.

It just seems that the counter case (that Eskimos don't have more words for snow than we do)should have at least been described
rather than simply asserted and the reasoning for the mistake described as well.

Almost a case of somebody calling the kettle black if you think about it.

Brad

Post A Reply Post New Topic ⇧ top of page ⇧ Go to Previous / Newer Topic Back to Topic List Go to Next / Older Topic
All times are ET (US). All dates are in Year-Month-Day format.
navwin » Main Forums » English Workshop » The Problem with Grammar References

Passions in Poetry | pipTalk Home Page | Main Poetry Forums | 100 Best Poems

How to Join | Member's Area / Help | Private Library | Search | Contact Us | Login
Discussion | Tech Talk | Archives | Sanctuary