»
Discussion
»
Q & A
»
Images
| Q & A |
|
Images |
|
Marshalzu  
since 2001-02-15
Posts 2681Lurking 
|
Just wondering why images are not allowed in signatures? |
||
| © Copyright 2002 Andrew Sewell - All Rights Reserved | |||
|
Christopher
Moderator
Member Rara Avis
since 1999-08-02
Posts 8296Purgatorial Incarceration |
testing |
||
|
Christopher
Moderator
Member Rara Avis
since 1999-08-02
Posts 8296Purgatorial Incarceration |
again |
||
|
Christopher
Moderator
Member Rara Avis
since 1999-08-02
Posts 8296Purgatorial Incarceration |
there we go - you CAN include images in your signature, you just have to use the UBB code instead of HTML - find out how Here Chris [This message has been edited by Christopher (05-20-2002 08:35 PM).] |
||
|
Marshalzu
since 2001-02-15
Posts 2681Lurking |
hmm ok maybe a better question is, is it allowed? |
||
|
Ron
Administrator
Member Rara Avis
since 1999-05-19
Posts 8669Michigan, US |
Is there a reason it should be allowed? Keeping in mind that Chris's image adds an extra 5,000 bytes to this page, which is probably fairly typical, is there any image we need to see over and over and over and over again with every post a person makes? |
||
|
Christopher
Moderator
Member Rara Avis
since 1999-08-02
Posts 8296Purgatorial Incarceration |
i don't know whether it should be allowed or not... i assumed that you might have had a reason for blocking the HTML, but not UBB, Ron. As for my image... it was just a random one pulled off my site to check this question... though it shows you do have a good point - perhaps a size limit? |
||
|
Marshalzu
since 2001-02-15
Posts 2681Lurking |
It kind of doesn't matter as the place where I am hosting the image is so unreliable that is totally useless, but if the option is there surely although you aren't encouraging it you are saying to people that they are allowed to do it. It's kind of confusing as on one hand the option is there and on the other you seem to imply that you don't like it. |
||
|
Christopher
Moderator
Member Rara Avis
since 1999-08-02
Posts 8296Purgatorial Incarceration |
My guess would be that Ron had intended to not allow it, and had simply overlooked the UBB possibility, or thought that no one would try to use it. I doubt the ambiguity was intentional. |
||
|
|
⇧ top of page ⇧ |
|
| All times are ET (US). All dates are in Year-Month-Day format. | ||
