navwin » Archives » Critical Analysis #1 » I Saw God
Critical Analysis #1
Post A Reply Post New Topic I Saw God Go to Previous / Newer Topic Back to Topic List Go to Next / Older Topic
dianawho?
New Member
since 2000-01-10
Posts 8


0 posted 2000-01-11 11:39 AM


dissolving me in your bloodstream
becoming your life
fusing me with your tongue
tasting eternity's breath
erasing my memory
pushing me deeper and farther
into blissful nothingness
touching Gods face
exploding with me
and recreating the universe

© Copyright 2000 dianawho? - All Rights Reserved
Not A Poet
Member Elite
since 1999-11-03
Posts 3885
Oklahoma, USA
1 posted 2000-01-11 02:51 PM


This is a nice start. It has interesting imagery but, in the end, it really says nothing (I think). It seems to me to be just an introduction but maybe someone more qualified will add better advice here soon. This does seem to be too valuable to get no more input.


 Pete

dianawho?
New Member
since 2000-01-10
Posts 8

2 posted 2000-01-11 04:12 PM


i appreciate your honesty.i write what i feel.and so what i feel may not be what you see when you read it. i am a beginner and so everyone has to start somewhere. the poem is about how i feel when i make love to my boyfriend. of course i dont expect everyone to get the same thing from my work. any advice on how i can better express myself? thank you for reading it.
jenni
Member
since 1999-09-11
Posts 478
Washington D.C.
3 posted 2000-01-11 04:28 PM


diana--

i thought this was absolutely beautiful!  i wouldn't change a thing (except maybe "further" for "farther" in line 6).  this piece is a tiny little gem, diana, very, very nice.  

jenni

dianawho?
New Member
since 2000-01-10
Posts 8

4 posted 2000-01-11 10:53 PM


I hope this poem doesn't sound cheap, i wanted to express sex as an out of body experience for me.
Brad
Member Ascendant
since 1999-08-20
Posts 5705
Jejudo, South Korea
5 posted 2000-01-12 02:05 AM


There's nothing cheap about writing about sex  as an out of body experience.  The problem is that isn't what you did.

WARNING: This is a little harsh. Be prepared or don't read any futher.      What follows is only a personal opinion to be thrown in the toilet if you choose to do so. It's only one poem and one person's opinion on that poem so please don't take it too seriously (and even with that said, I know I'm going to be lambasted for doing this. I don't know, consider this a trial by fire or something; I'm just tired of everybody being so nice around here)    


            dissolving me in your bloodstream
            becoming your life
            fusing me with your tongue


These images are not transcendental but material -- something out of some Virtual Reality thingey.

            tasting eternity's breath
            erasing my memory

I have no idea what eternity's breath tastes like and I don't think anybody else does either.  I've had this argument before with other poets so you're certainly not alone in using the word. I'm alone in railing against it.  Also, If your memory is erased, how can you remember what happened?


            pushing me deeper and farther
            into blissful nothingness
            touching Gods face
            exploding with me
            and recreating the universe

Here (as in the other parts of the piece as well), your using hyperbole to express what no doubt is a powerful emotion but you've gone so far that you've made it comic (in my opinion).  Again, I'm struck more by visual images and symbols of sex in television and the movies (fireworks and rockets) than I see anything resembling sex. There is no reference to people, to intimacy,  to love -- only to some philosophical enlightenment that has been achieved during an orgasm.  So, are you saying Buddhist sattori is akin to a permanent orgasm? (Don't worry -- I know Buddhist professors and monks who would agree with you on this point.)

Personally, I think you've set yourself up for a fall from the beginning; you're trying to do something that may, perhaps, be impossible to do. You say you write what you feel but in fact you don't. Nobody does. You write words in patterns to transmit ideas and feelings to readers (which includes yourself). How do you create the sensation you describe in someone else through words? I'll be honest: I don't know.  One guess would be indirection, never try to describe it directly but only describe around it in such a way that it triggers that feeling in others -- which, in a sense, is how you were able to feel it (from the circumstances of that particular moment).  Paradoxically, the moment you try to describe it directly, the moment you distance yourself from the reader.  In other words, it's more like saying "I've had this feeling and I want to share my feeling with you" rather than trying to get someone else to feel that feeling. I don't really have a definition for good poetry but I guess that would be it if I had to say something. Poetry isn't about the writer sharing feelings, it's about making the reader feel something, anything.

So, are you going to talk to me in the morning?  

Brad

Post A Reply Post New Topic ⇧ top of page ⇧ Go to Previous / Newer Topic Back to Topic List Go to Next / Older Topic
All times are ET (US). All dates are in Year-Month-Day format.
navwin » Archives » Critical Analysis #1 » I Saw God

Passions in Poetry | pipTalk Home Page | Main Poetry Forums | 100 Best Poems

How to Join | Member's Area / Help | Private Library | Search | Contact Us | Login
Discussion | Tech Talk | Archives | Sanctuary