Where were the facts, Mike, that you were presenting? Was there some dispute that the United States was treating with Afghanistan at the time? And that The United States was holding The Taliban responsible for activities within the country as the government of Afghanistan? Is there some reason I should have to prove something that you had been taking as an assumptive truth right along — that the Taliban was responsible for bib Laden's behavior as a State Sponsor. That is what you've been asserting, isn't it?
Why should I have to prove your assertion, Mike?
Deal with the post and stop trying to blame me for the flaws in the position that you attempt to take and defend. It's not a sensible position unless the logical contradictions can be ironed out. The responsibility for doing that, I'm afraid, lies with the flawed position, not for the ones who disagree with it...